Negotiation skill Free Essay Example, 3000 words

The artefact in question was in the possession of one Mr Simon Norten. The Indian government sued for repossession of the idol. The case which would have gone in India’s favour was compromised on the condition that the idol would be allowed to be displayed in the US for a further period of ten years. Mr Simon was also given immunity by the Indian Government that he was free to acquire within the next one year, any Indian antiques that could be found outside India. This gave some consolation to the Fine Arts museum since it involved a negotiated settlement that is international in stature and involving cultural property. Negotiations for the murals began two years later when the Mexican Consul General in San Francisco put the museum in touch with the National Institute of Anthropology and History (INAH), the body that had the authority to decide on all things that were before the pre-Columbian era. Research by the museum conformed that the murals belonged to the Teotihuacà ¡n era. It was also established that this collection was the largest one in existence outside Mexico. We will write a custom essay sample on Negotiation skill or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/pageorder now Moreover, no more than a dozen specimens existed in museums collection in the whole of Europe and the USA. Soon after the initial contact, the Mexican Government filed a petition in the US District court, requesting a stay on the will and the return of the murals as per the ‘Treaty of cooperation’. In the meantime the trustees of the museum formulated some possible areas of discussion with the INAH. The museum would work with authorities in Mexico authentication and preservation methods. The murals would remain with the museum until they were well protected and even if the murals were ordered to be returned to Mexico a mutual area of future cooperation would be worked out. But the verdict turned out to be in favour of the museum since the treaty came into force only in 1971 and there was proof to show that Mr Wagner had taken possession of the murals one year earlier. The other legatees of the will agreed that the museum was in a better position to handle the situation and they would not lay claim to any murals left to them. This resulted in the Fine Arts Museum being the sole owners of the priceless murals. The situation was that according to US law the murals belonged here whereas the Mexicans thought that they were the rightful owners. Even with the verdict going in their favour, the museum was willing to negotiate with the INAH for a compromise that would be acceptable to both parties. Negotiations resumed and by 1978, a four point agenda was agreed to with the INAH lawyer and the museum, which included joint protection and possible return of some of the murals.