Great Captains Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Great Captains - Essay ExampleA number of individuals from many walks of action find it quite fascinating to study war strategy over the past several super acid years and how the same strategies have been employed, despite the fact that warf are has changed dramatic all toldy overtime. Being that warfare has changed over the past one hundred fifty years, the study of captains, such as Napoleon, Ulysses Grant, and Frederick the Great are cool it valid for a modern military professional, as it is these three individuals who have contributed largely in formation our civilization and do it what it is today.One reason that the study of captains, such as Napoleon, Ulysses Grant, and Frederick the Great are lifelessness valid for a modern military professional is that a military professional muckle identify a great charter from these individuals. For instance, from the study of these great individuals, a modern military professional can learn to be an effective leader. The modern military can study the art of war from all three of these great captains and possibly employ some of these strategies in todays modern war fair. Some may challenge that learning the strategies of these captains is useless for a modern military professional, since war fair has changed so ofttimes since these men were alive. Those supporting this argument state that the weapons during the time of these captains were not as sophisticated as they are today, and wars are fought on a much larger scale than in times past. These captains did not deal with the challenges that we do now. Though these arguments are true and valid, the reasons for engaging in war are the same as they were since the beginning of humankind, and because of this, the study of such captains is relevant, as such study helps the future leader in decision making what he should and should not do to see to it that his outcomes are successful. If these three captains have employed a contingent strategy that brought th em a plethora of success, then there is no problem at all making use of that same strategy today. In regards to this, Paret and Clausewitz state that the purpose of war has always stayed the same, even though we now use more sophisticated weapons. Not to mention, the tactic to fall upon the enemy with the utmost force, to subdue on what allows the enemy to resist and do away with it so the enemy can resist no longer and the desire to annihilate the enemy has been the same. Furthermore, the definition of war has also stayed the same, as war is exclusively a way for us to force the enemy to do our will and see to it that it is carried out (Chapter One, throw One). Anformer(a) reason that the study of these great captains is valid for a modern military professional is that a great deal can be learned from their use of intelligence. On the subject of intelligence as it pertains to war, Paret and Clausewitz state that those who are savages normally fight solely motivated by passion. There is no accepted intelligence on their part, as they are going to do whatever it takes to destroy their enemy. On the other hand, civilized peoples actually take the time out to sit and strategize how they will attack their enemy, defeat them, and successfully conquer them, if conquering is part of the reason that the war is being fought (Chapter One, Book One). These three great captains, no doubt, took the time to intelligently strategize how they would advance upon their enemies. Surely, they did feel some passion of hatred for their enemy, hence the reason they would attack them in the first place, as one would not attack someone they